

|
|
The aim of ISO/TS 16949 is the development of a quality management system that provides for continual improvement, emphasizing defect prevention and the reduction of variation and waste in the supply chain.
TS 16949 applies to the design/development, production and, when relevant, installation and servicing of automotive-related products.
The requirements are intended to be applied throughout the supply chain. For the first time vehicle assembly plants will be encouraged to seek ISO/TS 16949 certification.
What is ISO/TS 16949:2002 ?
The ISO/TS 16949:2002 standard was published in March 2002 together with
the following supporting documents:
- guidance for implementation,
- IATF rules,
- checklist,
- core tools, such as APQP, PPAP, FMEA, MSA, SPC,
- customer specific requirements (released by Vehicle Manufacturers - VMs).
This new standard is more demanding than QS-9000 because it has been
strengthened in many key areas which should benefit the manufacturer and
its customers:
- Senior management involvement through setting and communicating
quality objectives, allocating resource and integrating these into business
plans.
- Product realization, which covers the whole process from planning &
design, through production, sales, processing, delivery and aftersales
service.
- Analysis and improvement, where data is used to continually improve
product quality and processes.
- Supplier development where organisations must demonstrate a stronger
commitment to improving their own supply base.
- Organizational performance requirements focusing on delivered part
quality, on time delivery and customer performance.
VMs are generally either making ISO/TS 16949 a mandatory requirement or
encouraging their suppliers to upgrade to the new standard. VMs including
Ford, General Motors, Peugeot-Citroen, Renault, Fiat, BMW, DaimlerChrysler
and Volkswagen accept ISO/TS 16949 as an alternative to current automotive
standards.
VMs have made it fairly clear that ISO/TS 16949 registration will help
suppliers achieve "preferred supplier" status. QS-9000 is seen as having
failed either as a measure of overall supplier performance or as a tool to
ensure that quality products are delivered.
However, each OEM will have slightly different requirements and will adopt
one of the following positions with respect to ISO/TS 16949 registration:
- suppliers must be able to demonstrate that they are in compliance only
with no registration required,
- registration is optional, but upgrading from QS-9000 is encouraged and
ISO/TS 16949 is recognized as a substitute for QS-9000.
- Phased in approach across the supply chain, meaning different rules
apply at different levels.
- Mandate registration with fixed dates by which it has to be achieved.
How is ISO/TS 16949 better than QS-9000?
- Vehicle Manufacturers - VMs view:
- Registration involves a generally more rigorous assessment, and is better guarantor of
supplier performance,
- increased emphasis on customer requirements,
- less bureaucracy at all levels,
- reduced variation in assessment (performance),
- better control of the registration and assessor training process,
- focus on continual improvement.
- Supplier's view:
- increased reciprocal recognition of registration amongst VMs due to clearer and stronger
oversight and greater consistency in the registration process,
- avoidance of multiple registration to VDA6, EAQF, AVSQ & QS-9000, thereby avoiding
duplication in terms of preparation, documentation and 3rd party audits,
- vocabulary consistent with ISO 9001:2000 and therefore ISO 14001 (Environmental
Management System),
- adoption of a process approach which is more consistent with the way the most effective
companies are currently operating,
- increased focus on continual improvement.
|
|
|